Bailed-out banks, Freddie Mac, AIG gave $6 million to 2008 conventions

Bailed-out banks, Freddie Mac, AIG gave $6 million to 2008 conventions:
The Republican nominating convention that kicks off Monday in Tampa (weather permitting), has been funded by tens of millions of dollars in corporate contributions, the exact source of which won’t be known until after the party is over.
But it’s a sure bet that there are at least two big donors from the 2008 event that won’t be giving this time around — American International Group and Freddie Mac.
The two institutions together gave $1 million to the Republican convention host committee. A few months after the conclusion of the convention they were in danger of collapse, and would ultimately receive a combined $139 billion taxpayer bailout.
The donations are possible thanks to a loophole in campaign finance rules that allow corporations, unions and wealthy individuals to give unlimited sums to support the conventions.
It is “absolutely ridiculous” that corporations are able to make such donations, says Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. He calls it “nothing but throwing money at the feet of congressional and White House leaders, presumably with the assumption of getting something in return.”
The two groups were bipartisan in their giving.
AIG gave $750,000 to both the Republican and Democratic host committees. The government would eventually sink $71 billion into the insurance giant. Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac gave $250,000 to both committees. Three days after the close of the Republican event, the government took it over along with Fannie Mae. Taxpayers ultimately sunk $70 billion into the floundering institution.
In all, $6 million was donated by financial institutions that received bailout money to both party conventions, according to a Center for Public Integrity review of Federal Election Commission filings — $3.4 million to Republicans and $2.6 million to Democrats
The total raised for the previous conventions is likely much higher than what we will see this year.
Through the end of 2008, the Republican host committee collected more than $65 million for the event, conducted in Minneapolis, while the Democratic convention in Denver drew about $63 million.
Republicans, meeting in Tampa, barring the arrival of a possible hurricane, aim for $50 million while Democrats, meeting in Charlotte, N.C., a week later, set a relatively modest goal of $37 million, having refused to accept direct contributions from corporations.
It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Reforms in the 1970s were meant to keep corporate money out of conventions. In 1972, as Republicans were trying to decide where to host their national convention, International Telephone & Telegraph offered $400,000 if the GOP would bring it to San Diego. Eight days later, the administration of President Richard Nixon dropped antitrust litigation against IT&T and offered a settlement that was favorable to the corporate giant.
After details of the apparent deal appeared in the press, Republicans tried to save face and moved the convention from San Diego to Miami Beach.
The scandal prompted Congress to enact a new law that would provide taxpayer funding for the parties' conventions, thus removing the need for private contributions — in theory, anyway. For 2012, each party has received $18.2 million from the U.S. Treasury to help defray costs.
But both parties are permitted to operate nonprofit corporations known as “host committees” set up as charitable organizations to offset the financial burden on local governments associated with hosting the conventions.
Democrats have struck a populist note this year, prohibiting direct corporate, political action committee and lobbyist donations. The party has also restricted individual donations to $100,000.
Campaign finance reformers still see loopholes — corporations are allowed, for instance, to make "in-kind" contributions.
During the Democrats’ 2008 convention in Denver, companies provided the host committee with about $5.8 million in in-kind contributions, including $1.7 million in “network equipment” from the tech giant Cisco System, which, records show, was the No. 1 corporate donor to the host committee.
Yet still, “it’s a very significant departure from the past,” Holman said.
The No. 1 corporate supporter of the Republican’s host committee was Qwest, now CenturyLink, which provided nearly $5 million. About half of that was donated directly to the committee and about half was from in-kind contributions. The telecommunications firm also gave roughly $840,000 to the Democratic host committee.
The top individual donor to the Republican committee was Raymond T. Dalio, founder of Bridgewater investments, the world’s largest hedge fund. He gave $2 million.
Overall, companies contributed more than $40 million to the Democratic host committee in Denver and unions donated about $9 million, according to federal records. And companies contributed roughly $52 million to the Republicans’ host committee in Minneapolis-St. Paul.
The Republicans’ Tampa host committee website lists more than two dozen companies and trade associations as “our sponsors.”
This year, companies ranging from Coca-Cola and Wells Fargo to Xerox and UPS are working to ensure that they have a presence at both conventions.
“There’s a lot of cost around the convention,” said Wells Fargo spokesman Kathy Harrison. “It is important as a good corporate citizen to support the host city.”
Wells Fargo was one of the banks that benefited from the government’s bank bailout, though it has paid the $25 billion equity investment back, plus a $2.3 billion profit.
In 2008, the Republican host committee received $3.4 million in donations from banks that received investments from the U.S. Treasury. Donations came from U.S. Bancorp ($1 million); Goldman Sachs & Co. ($255,000); Wells Fargo ($250,000); J.P. Morgan Chase ($100,000) and Morgan Stanley ($100,000) and others.
The Democratic host convention collected $2.6 million, including nearly $330,000 from Wells Fargo and its foundation; nearly $317,000 from U.S. Bancorp; $250,000 from both Goldman Sachs and Citigroup; $150,000 from Morgan Stanley and $100,000 from Bank of America.
Most of the banks and other institutions that made contributions to the conventions have recovered nicely from the recession, once again posting healthy profits — with at least one major exception. Lehman Brothers, whose bankruptcy filing in 2008 spun the global financial markets into a panic, gave $100,000 to the Democratic convention.

All the posts are provided by me and any comments l provide are my own view of the markets and are not the views of the article writer and or news provider.Tweet this story #AceNewsServices

OFT issues Statement of Objections against Booking.com, Expedia and Intercontinental Hotels Group

OFT issues Statement of Objections against Booking.com, Expedia and Intercontinental Hotels Group: The OFT has issued a Statement of Objections alleging that Booking.com, Expedia Inc and InterContinental Hotels Group plc have infringed competition law in relation to the online supply of room only hotel accommodation by online travel agents.

All the posts are provided by me and any comments l provide are my own view of the markets and are not the views of the article writer and or news provider.Email us your news and views to Ace News Desk or tweet your views at #AceNewsServices 

OFT secures refunds for consumers following Olympic ticket investigation

OFT secures refunds for consumers following Olympic ticket investigation: Following an OFT investigation, Euroteam AS, Uncus AS, Ticket and Travel AS and the controlling director of these companies, Andreas Gyrre, have given undertakings to the High Court in relation to the unauthorised sale of tickets to the London Olympics.

" The Roving Giraffe News Report " tweet your views at #AceNewsServices or email your News and Views to our AceNewsDesk  

Airbus Could Reduce Plane Fuel Consumption 15% with Hydrogen Fuel Cell

Airbus Could Reduce Plane Fuel Consumption 15% with Hydrogen Fuel Cell:
The idea is to take a load off the plane's engines by powering non-propulsion systems - basically everything that run on electricity in the plane, light the entertainment electronics avionics, lights, etc - with a fuel cell rather than with the engines.

Ed says! The word " could " in this post, when we talk of reducing fuel consumption! Will depend on lobbying by fuel companies and how powerful and if they can get their own way! Many times ideas like this have been shelved in favour of profit before the environment! What is your news and views email me at Ace News and Views    
or tweet your question at #AceFinanceNews

All the posts are provided by me and any comments l provide are my own view of the markets and are not the views of the article writer and or news provider.

World's First Deep Sea Gold & Copper Mine Coming to Papua New Guinea

World's First Deep Sea Gold & Copper Mine Coming to Papua New Guinea:
A Canadian company will soon begin an unprecedented mining in the deep sea off the coast of Papua New Guinea

Another disaster waiting to happen when they start mining for gold and copper? What is your news and views?    
#AceNewsServices  

Key Republicans Rally Behind Wind Power in Congress

Key Republicans Rally Behind Wind Power in Congress:
With an important tax credit set to expire, Republicans and Democrats alike are defending wind power's importance to the economy.

This is our opinion and feelings about the the posts added to this blog by ourselves and writers who have asked to write on our blog network and does not necessarily represent our agreement or disagreement with the writers concerned.

Olympic security highlights seven weaknesses in UK industry policy

Olympic security highlights seven weaknesses in UK industry policy:

Reblogged from Dr Alf's Blog:

Royal Standard of the United Kingdom (Photo credit: lydia_shiningbrightly)

The Telegraph newspaper picks up a topical story in the UK media. It’s well worth a read. Check it out!

Olympic security: The firm at centre of the shambles ‘has seen fee rise by £53m’ – Telegraph.

However for me, it highlights a number of powerful weaknesses in  UK industry policy:

Read more… 397 more words

This is the type of funding that could be so easily used to help our care industry and people in need! Instead of G4S it should be " Good For Us "

" The Roving Giraffe News Report " provided through Ace News Service