Monday, 7 October 2013

About Me and My Organisation

English: Pictogram, for "Internet (World ...English: Pictogram, for "Internet (World wide web) address", "Home page". Like @ for e-mail (by @+www) Esperanto: Русский: Аналог @ для "www" (пиктограмма строки "Адрес в Интернете"). По мотивам "@" и "www" (гибрид при скрещивании). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
This page is all about me and our organisation and growing network on the web. 


Financial Information commented: "My spouse and I stumbled over here different web address and thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to exploring your web page repeatedly."

New comment on Ace Finance News

Financial Information commented on About Me & My Organisation .
in response to acefinance:
This page is all about me and our organisation and growing network on the web. Firstly l started on-line just about 3 years ago and did not have a clue how to even find a website and so started as l had always done reading and learning, now we have 250 plus sites and thousands […]
My spouse and I stumbled over here different web address and thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to exploring your web page repeatedly.
Reply    Comments
Want less email? Modify your Subscription Options.

Enhanced by Zemanta

IFS analysis of public finance figures - Your View?

English: HM Treasury, LondonEnglish: HM Treasury, London (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


IFS analysis of today's public finance figures: 

Office for National Statistics and HM Treasury published Public Sector Finances July 2012. We now have details of central government receipts, central government spending, public sector net investment, borrowing and debt for the first four months of financial year 2013–14.

Headline Comparisons
Central government current receipts in July were 3.5% higher than in the same month last year, excluding the impact of transfers related to the Asset Purchase Facility. Receipts over the four months April to July were 4.9% higher than in the same months of 2012. The Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR's) forecast at the time of the March 2013 Budget implied that central government current receipts for the whole of 2013–14 would be 3.0% above 2012–13 levels.
Central government current spending in July was 3.7% higher than in the same month last year. Spending over the four months April to July was 4.3% higher than in the same months of 2012. The OBR's forecast at the time of the March 2013 Budget implied that central government current spending for the whole of 2013–14 would be 2.2% above 2012–13 levels.
Public sector net investment in July was £1.8bn, £0.2 billion more than was spent in July last year. Together, public sector net investment during the first four months of 2013–14 has been £5.6bn. This is 9.3% more than was spent between April and July in 2012, excluding the impact of the transfer of assets from the Royal Mail Pension Plan to the public sector. The OBR's forecast at the time of the March 2013 Budget predicted that net investment over the whole of 2013–14 would be £24.2 billion, which is 7.3% above last year's level excluding the impact of Royal Mail.
Rowena Crawford, a Senior Research Economist at the IFS, said:
"At first sight, today's figures look disappointing. The Treasury ran a deficit in July this year, whereas they normally run a surplus in this month as a significant chunk of corporation tax payments are made in July. But underlying this headline figure is the continuation of two trends that might not - yet - give us cause for concern.

Receipts of taxes on both corporate and personal income have grown more quickly so far this year than forecast by the OBR for the year as a whole. But we should be cautious of inferring too positive a message from this, as income tax payments are likely to be more front-loaded this year than last as people shifted income to take advantage of the new, lower 45p top rate of income tax and receipts of VAT have grown more sluggishly than forecast for the year as a whole.

On the other hand central government current spending has grown more quickly so far than forecast for the year as a whole. But some of this could be merely differences in the timing of payments this year compared to last, and therefore might unwind later on."
The full analysis can be downloaded from:  http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/6835
Previous analysis of public finance figures can be found at: http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/browse?type=pf




Enhanced by Zemanta

EUropean Economic Community – Prelude To The EU

Peace, When It Loses The War.' and details of the massive amounts of cash moved out of Germany during the war to safeguard the future of German domination against the economic collapse of losing the Second World War against EUropean Union. AND connections with organisations like The Bilderberger's, Council for Foreign relations, Tri Lateral Commission and other arms of the New World Order


acefinance posted: "Peace, When It Loses The War.' and details of the massive amounts of cash moved out of Germany during the war to safeguard the future of German domination against the economic collapse of losing the Second World War against EUropean Union. AND connections"

New post on Ace Finance News

acefinance:
Euro Disaster  Peace, When It Loses The War.' and details of the massive amounts of cash moved out of Germany during the war to safeguard the future of German domination against the economic collapse of losing the Second World War against EUropean Union. AND connections with organisations like The Bilderberger's, Council for Foreign relations, Tri Lateral Commission and other arms of the New World Order.
Around the end of 1939, most of Europe was either consciously or unconsciously under the influence of the economic concept of England. Over recent years, however, it has been swept out of European countries, politically, militarily and economically. Politically the three-power pact has given honour once again to the ancient figures of life, people and room. It has also established a natural order and a neighbourly way of co-existing as the ideal of the new order. The foundation of English economics, which is the basis of the balance of powers, has been militarily destroyed. And economically, a change has come about after the political and military development, the shape of which is easy to describe, but whose final significance is very difficult to evaluate. I can only repeat, that the changing order that is happening now has to be ranked as one of the greatest economic revolutions in history. It signifies a reversion of the economy of Europe to a time before the English concept of building an overseas Europe, i.e. an awareness of one's own country.
The Discussion so far and its Results
Discussions about questions relating to Europe started as the power of the NSADP grew. At the Congress of Europe in Rome from 14th to 20th November 1932, Alfred Rosenberg developed, for the first time in front of an international forum, thoughts and ideas that have moved us since. No one, who fights for a new economic order in Europe, can ignore these perceptions and conclusions. The economic and political wheel was set in motion, when the NSDAP declared the militarization of the German economy. It is to the credit of the journal 'Germany's Economy' that it first seized these questions in 1932, kept on bringing them up and stuck doggedly to those original perceptions. The idea of German economic self- sufficiency in the new political sense and the German economic militarization are synonymous with this journal. Besides this, Daitz, the ambassador, has earned the special credit of being the first to have related German economic history to the present time. Part II of his selected speeches and essays, which appeared in 1938 under the title 'Germany and the European Economy', summarizes his concepts formed between 1932 and 1938. The Italian, Carlo Scarfoglio, delivered with his book 'England and the Continental Mainland', a decisive historical contribution to the consciousness of the European continent. Meanwhile German and Italian economic policy drew the political consequences from the historical lessons that were learnt during the blockade and learnt again during the sanctions. The speech made in Munich in 1939 by the leader of the Reich's farmers, R. Walther Darre, at the 6th Great Lecture at the Commission of Economic Policy of the NSDAP, takes a special place in the discussion at that time. Its theme was "The market order of the National-Socialist agricultural policy - setting the pace for a new foreign trade order."
While our leader maintained the hope of reaching a peaceful agreement with England, the route for European economic unity remained problematic. The end of 1939 was a decisive point and it was natural that the years 1940-1941 heralded the new economic and political order. The writer, in particular, developed and extended in speech and writing the intellectual fund of the new economic policy, which has been translated into most languages, so that today everywhere the great constructive texts are known. These contexts revolve around the following issues:
  1. Theory about the Reich and the European economy.
  1. The historic, cultural, and economic significance of the German economic order.
  1. The foundations of the future economic relationships between the states.
  1. The nature of the European economic community.
On 25th June 1940 the Reich's Economic Minister, Funk, publicised in his official capacity his thoughts, which underlined the development so far and thus gave them state sanction. In October, the journal 'German Economy' summarised for the first time the principles of European co-operation, the fundamental principles of German foreign trade, Germany's export economy and ways and means of promoting export. It did so in a popular review "About A New Europe", providing an overview of the important problem of European economic fusion. Around the end of 1940 the Berlin historian Fritz Rorig finally outlined in his book "Hanseatic Essence" the historical foundations of the greatest economic and political achievement by the Germans.
I am clear in my mind that total clarity is to be found in the principle questions: The necessity is recognised for a political order for the economic co-operation of the people. The nature of the new order : awareness of tradition, using up one's own economic resources, long-term economic agreements and fair relations, is affirmed. The economic inter-dependence is underlined by fate. The economic unity of Europe is thus clear.

Economic Practice:

Even practical economic life has increasingly allowed entry to new thoughts. I am able to see the decisive steps in the start and realisation of the following points:
  1. In the increasing payment traffic through Berlin.
  1. In the exchange of experiences in various areas of economic life. Thereto belong also the statements of ministers and business people, the calls made by special advisers and the collective tackling of important tasks relating to the economy. Even the specialist is surprised, once he has taken the trouble to put together all the connections. Today they are already legion.
  1. In the signing of long-term economic agreements between the Reich and the other European states, which the public is aware of, there can be no doubt that such agreements are those of the future.
Of course, that cannot prevent unclear points and new problems from arising, which become clear at the time when the situation is reviewed.
Problems Related to the Economic Community of Continental Europe
These unclear points primarily relate to the concept of economic direction, the extent of solidarity and neighbourly attitude, the development of one's own powers, the care to maintain the standard of living and the question of raw material purchase from foreign countries. It is natural that one or another issue will take priority of interest, depending on the set of conditions that prevail. It should be attempted at this point to give a reply, albeit a summary one.
There can be no doubt that the concept of direction of the economy, or rather its leadership, is as novel as it is revolutionary. Its classification is all the more important, as the fate and consequence of European co-operation depend principally on a new consistent form of economic understanding. The Anglo-Saxon view of economics is dead: consequently, even the so-called 'classical' national economy is no longer classical, but it has survived. So what it comes down to is that a new understanding arises to do with ideology and terminology, which represents a sound basis for agreement and co-operation. Relating to this, one must point out the following in detail:
  1. Economic direction is not a momentary emergency solution, instead it forms the core of new theory and practice. First of all, it takes the place of individual egotism and the automatic autonomy of the Anglo-Saxon precept.
  1. Economic direction is not identical to the tendencies of a centrally planned economy. It does not seek to cancel the individual or to administer through the state operators.
  1. Economic direction really means the following: the new instruction of the creative and constructive power of the individual in relation to the whole system; the creation of a consistent economic view and an attitude towards the economy; the selection of important tasks through political leadership and the state's final decision on all questions about economic power. Beyond this, the economy is free and responsible to itself.
The degree of solidarity of the individual economies and their neighbourly attitude is characterised by three guidelines:
Firstly, it is limited in regard to its own economic development by the recognition that the utilisation of individual resources represents not only a requirement of the new economic precept, but is the very foundation for economic activity. The European economic community has no interest in leaving any abilities or possibilities unutilised.
Secondly, it contains the obligation that, because of Europe's freedom, consideration is given firstly to continental Europe regarding any matter related to economic activity. Not only should the shared fate of the European people be emphasized, but the fact should also be stressed that the supplementation of the European economies beyond their borders is possible and sought after.
Thirdly, it must be maintained that, above all else, the spirit of the individual economies may not be allowed to go against the spirit of neighbourly co-operation.
The question of developing one's own powers refers to the problem of mono-cultures, of industrialisation of the agrarian south-east and the awakening of new needs.
An answer can easily be given to the first question. Mono-cultures are the result of the same economic precept that made the world market price the determining factor in the economy. According to that precept, people and land are the vestiges of some by-gone age. Europe is well on the way to destroying these mono-cultures with initiatives ranging from land improvements and growing new crops to discovering new local resources. All these have the same aim, which is to develop the economy and broaden its basis. Germany and the whole of Europe can only greet these efforts with gratitude.
The industrialisation of the south-east poses a particular problem regarding these questions. As I am unable to handle this problem - like all other problems - here in a comprehensive and exhaustive manner, because the industrialisation of economies is theoretically a difficult problem, I can only say as follows:
  1. Just as it is in the nature of things that each country will strive to utilise its available resources for its own production, so will there will be a knock-on effect for other economic partners.
  1. If, as is the case in the South-east European countries, there is heavy over-population in the countryside, then there are only three possibilities to solve it: itinerant workers, a permanent emigration and an 'intensivisation' of the local economy, a term correctly created by Dr. Ilgner for the problem of industrialisation. Itinerant workers can only form a part solution. Besides, it only applies to agricultural and construction workers and gone on for ages. Permanent emigration from Europe is just as false as impossible. There just remains the intensivisation of the economies of south-east Europe as the way to self-help.
3. The economies should make it possible for an independent life according to the modern economic view. The intensivisation of their economies therefore is right for the time.
4. The old features of industrialisation, which evolved from the price collapses in countries with agriculture and raw materials, have to now belong to the past. Europe is a communal living area. Only through a joint development of economies - and not through independence from one another - can protection against crises be achieved.
5. The tasks that have to be solved in Europe are so big that the powers needed to do so have to be released by an intensivisation of the each economy. This can be easily done by employing the workers that have been liberated in new branches of the economy.
Without affecting the difficult questions of purchasing power, it can be regarded as proven that the joint work to build up Germany's and the south-eastern states' in the area of industrialisation lies in the direction of the intensivation of interest of the whole continent.
One important and until now completely overlooked task in this regard exists and that is the awakening of new needs in the south-eastern countries. It is because, in those countries, wealth has grown and will gradually continue to grow, as a result of the reliable purchase of agricultural products and available raw materials at adequate price levels. According to the principle in economics that giving equals taking, peoples' living habits there will have to change, otherwise one day the process will come to a halt. Germany's ability to absorb the products from the south-east is practically infinite, whereas creating a demand for German goods there is not only a matter for economic intensivation but also one of modifying the people so they consume more. This task is of such importance that it has to be considered from the very outset, so that the south-eastern European economies are elevated after the war.
Equally important as the industrialisation of south-east Europe is the question of the standard of living in the north. Their economic development and high standard of living, which underpin their lives though all economic conditions, should not be mistaken. This standard of living has grown considerably during the 19th century and around the time of the world war due to free trade, so that various circles view world economic events with particular concern. From a German viewpoint, only the following points can be made:
Firstly, a higher standard of living is also the aim of the German government. The German people not only understand this well, but also through its fight wants to ensure European civilisation and culture. This fight will benefit the whole of Europe, and with it the north.
Secondly, despite being connected successfully to England and its economic system (one should not ignore the countless economic troughs that feature there), the economies of the north whose fate and greatness are very closely linked to Germany.
Thirdly, the northern states' difficulties are going through a temporary phase of adjustment. In the long-term, this will bring about a lasting advancement, rather than destruction, for their economies' foundations.
Maintaining a high standard of living is not an insoluble problem. To finish, I now come to the problem of purchasing raw materials from overseas markets. A leading south-east European economist once wrote about this principal question: "Unlike the war, we were in the following situation: in order to import raw materials from overseas countries, we bought goods from west European countries with foreign exchange. In the area of continental Europe there is no gold. Everything had to pass through the system of clearing - goods sold against goods. We have no product that can be sold to North or South America. That means that the leading nations are obliged to acquire and distribute to us the raw materials that we need. The leading nations of Europe can supply, with its capacity, enough products to overseas countries with which to acquire raw materials. The one question is whether exchange will ever happen… Even before the new order is introduced, and without even joining in with the Axis powers, we stand in solidarity outside Europe with its traffic of goods…"

Related articles
Comment    See all comments    Like
Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://acefinance.me/2013/08/19/european-economic-community-prelude-to-the-eu/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


Enhanced by Zemanta

Charity Bank formally sheds charitable status - Civil Society - Share



Civil Society
Thought this was interesting! please share or tweet adding #AceFinanceNews 
Charity Bank formally sheds charitable status
Charity Bank ceased to be a charity at close of business recently following changes in European banking regulations that make it impossible for the body to continue as both a charity and a bank.

Enhanced by Zemanta

If you fail to carry-out your duties with one contract the UK government will give you another one!



This is the case of failed Olympic Contractor G4s who never got off the ground with their security issues, during the Olympics!


Lamonica Ayuso commented: "I simply want to mention I'm all new to weblog and truly loved you're blog. More than likely I'm likely to bookmark your blog post . You amazingly come with beneficial articles and reviews. Cheers for sharing your blog."

New comment on Ace Finance News

in response to acefinance:
This is the case of failed Olympic Contractor G4s who never got off the ground with their security issues, during the Olympics! So what better way to reward them, than to grant a £150 million gas contract through none other than their favoured company "British Gas" l was also told by my contact that in […]
I simply want to mention I'm all new to weblog and truly loved you're blog. More than likely I'm likely to bookmark your blog post . You amazingly come with beneficial articles and reviews. Cheers for sharing your blog.
Reply    Comments
Want less email? Modify your Subscription Options.
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

Enhanced by Zemanta

Does The Taxpayer Really Know Who Owns Their Services!

Logo of Atos Origin used prior to July 2011.Logo of Atos Origin used prior to July 2011. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Take a real good look at all contracts awarded by this Government, or read some of my articles high-lighting who is getting the lion's share! 



Luis Vines commented: "I simply want to mention I am very new to blogs and definitely savored you're web site. More than likely I'm going to bookmark your blog post . You absolutely have incredible articles and reviews. Cheers for sharing with us your blog."

New comment on Ace Finance News

in response to acefinance:
Take a real good look at all contracts awarded by this Government, or read some of my articles high-lighting who is getting the lion's share! Also check out companies like G4′s, Atos, Capita and even Ipsos and see who is making the profits! Even look at the bigger picture and the likes of British Gas […]
I simply want to mention I am very new to blogs and definitely savoured you're web site. More than likely I'm going to bookmark your blog post . You absolutely have incredible articles and reviews. Cheers for sharing with us your blog.
Reply    Comments
Want less email? Modify your Subscription Options.
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

Enhanced by Zemanta